Wednesday, October 19, 2005

RM 100 for 6 month starvation

I was so shock when I read an articles in the news paper recently. There was an engineer left a german shedherd dog in the house for 6 month without food!!!! When the dog was found by SPCA, she was already moribund. Due to guarded prognosis, she had been euthanised. The post mortem examination reviewed that the dog has not been eating for a long while where the digestive system were all empty, poor body condition, severe skin lesions and the dog was suffering from heavy tick infestation. The engineer was charged at court. He admitted to the crime, that's a good things..but but the very ##8!*%... dunno how to explain punya judge fined him RM 100. RM 100 seems to be very very big like bull cart wheel for us student, but RM 100 for a dog's life plus what she had suffered for the past 6 months?? Is the judge so naive to think that RM 100 is a big sum,or he does not know how suffer it is to be starved for 6 month??? Does the judge ever think that RM 100 is enough to stop people from doing it again? RM 100 might be a peanut for some people. And the guy, the engineer, is he qualified to be the owner of the dog? Because he has no human compassion, no feeling...A graduate from university, a professional...is that what he had learnt from thirty years of living? Just be responsible to your pet, to your action. Just like rearing a child....If you feel you are not committed, pls dun do it.....many people will appreciate you , including your pet..thank you..

4 comments:

doBot said...

I hope one day, someone from our coursemate could be a politician, and change the act.

zerogravity maybe...

Fanfan said...

Who is going to change this ? not just the politician, if you ever see your neighbour do it, educate them straight away

pam said...

let us all creep into his hse, implant an auto-ghostly-dog-yowling-player tat automatically turns on at the strike of midnight.. oh, and turns off automatically at 5am. frighten him out of his shoes!

Eve said...

I think it takes time to change the act. Imagine that from 1952 till now, how many years already??still havent change. Pam's suggestion very good, but is it practical arr?? U watch too much movie is it??